S-51
Cognition, Behavior, and Memory
Same Performance, Different Neural Cost: Effects of Chronic Stress on Brain Oscillations During Selective Attention
Felipe Muñoz1,2, Pablo Moya3,4, Jean-Gabriel Minonzio5, Paulo Barraza6,7, Ricardo Illesca-Matus6,8, Gonzalo Terreros2
1. Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias e Ingeniería para la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.
2. Laboratorio de Neurociencia Sensorial Perceptual y Cognitiva, Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile.
3. Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
4. Instituto de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
5. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ingeniería en Salud, Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
6. Center for Advanced Research in Education (CIAE), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
7. Institute for Advanced Studies in Education (IE), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
8. Centro Convive, Facultad de Educación, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco, Chile.
Presenting Author:
felipe.munoza@postdoc.uoh.cl
Chronic stress is a maladaptive response to persistent noxious stimuli that induces neurobiological alterations affecting cognitive processes. Behavioural performance often remains stable in such states, yet the neurophysiological mechanisms of selective attention require more precise characterisation. This study assessed the impact of perceived chronic stress on brain oscillations by analysing spectral density during an auditory selective attention task. Participants were classified into Low Perceived Stress (LPS) and High Perceived Stress (HPS) groups using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Brain electrical activity was recorded with a 32-channel EEG system during a digits-in-noise (DiN) test, and signals were processed with MNE-Python. Time-frequency analysis used a complex Morlet wavelet (2–45 Hz) to estimate spectral power across groups. Behavioural performance showed no significant differences: both groups achieved a comparable number of correct responses. Electrophysiological analysis, however, revealed significantly higher spectral density in Beta and Gamma oscillations in the HPS group during correct trials, in both frontal and parietal regions. Individuals with high chronic stress therefore sustain performance equivalent to non-stressed individuals at a higher neural cost, since compensatory recruitment of high-frequency activity indicates that additional neural resources are needed to execute selective attention tasks.